Home Improvement

The articles that I read for our second reading assignment had to do with improving the area surrounding some of our U.S. cities. More specifically, the articles focus on the downfall of living in Detroit during the mid 1900’s and the efforts to improve a suburban neighborhood in Atlanta called Mableton. Rebecca Solnit chose to write about the past, present, and future living conditions that Detroit has to offer, and what seen and unseen forces are the reason behind many physical changes. She examines the past image of Detroit, going back to the English settlers fighting wars against the native people of the land. She helps us to examine what Detroit would look like if the coarse of history was different. On the other hand, Glenn Ruffenach wrote an article that used a suburb of Atlanta as his example to prove that small cities and suburbs are all facing similar problems today that have to deal with the living conditions of senior citizens. He states that areas in the united states, especially down south like Georgia, need to improve the living conditions of urbanism to make people stay and live longer. His main focus is based on the happiness and satisfaction of the people, because one of his main points indicate a need for creating a “lifelong community.” In my response I plan to extricate the views and ideals of these two writers and include my personal opinion on the matter. The evidence and support that is the base of Solnits argument is very creditable. She has been to Detroit numerous times in the past, with each time discovering a new factor that influences the way she views the city and its neoclassical form. She also uses historical evidence, such as the time when the Model T was producing 9,000 cars per day and Detroit made a name for itself through the auto industry. She mentions a great fact in her paper when she says that back in 1925, Detroit accounted for 1 and every 10 cars produced in America. Now the same exact place where the model T was born is just a broken down warehouse in shambles. Glenn Ruffenach, though, does not use empirical evidence and concrete facts to support his view of creating a “lifelong community.” Instead, he uses models and theories that have the capability to improve the areas in and around U.S. cities. For example, he mentions how new street grids in Fayetteville, Georgia could turn it into a walking town, which in turn would help senior citizens exercise and have a nice, long place to live. If the two got together for coffee, I am sure that they would agree on many points that can be taken into effect when speaking about improving a city. They both emphasize the need for better community living for older people. They would agree on the fact that older people create an influence for the young and new to come in and make a living, instead of always running in and out of various cities. My view on the situation is the exact same as Ruffenach’s, because I believe that creating a livable urban area must be focused around efforts in transportation, and most importantly, living conditions within small communities.

Mandatory Blog Entry 3

The chapter 5 reading was dedicated to the art of convincing by example. We learn how references to specific examples in the past can contribute enormously to points we are trying to make in the present. The key to a successfull example is its specificity in relation to the current probleme. The book uses an example of a man trying to convince his neighbor to keep his dog in his own yard. By using a specific example of another dog running wild outside of it's owner's fence he tries to convince the dog owner to keep his own pet within the confines of his yard. However, it is important to note that the example of a past dog gone out of control had to have happened in the same neighborhood so that the current dog owner can properly relate to the lesson. If the first dog had ruined the current dog owner's property than that example would arrouse very sharp and specific emotions and sensory memories, thereby enabling the dog owner to relate to his neighbors concerns.

Examples are not the saem as inductions because sweeping generalizations or not made. They are usually just one event being used as a lense through which another event is viewed. Although inductions can usually be informed by examples. They also need to be specifically tailored to the person involved or else the effect is no where near as potent.

Successful examples can also be fabricated, or drawn from fables and myths. Often times a fable or fictional account can be used to better illustrate a rhetor's point when history doesn't not provide as concrete of an example. Also these made up examples can be much less complicated and, through symbolism, may be easier for the 'target' to understand. Usually thsee fabricated examples will be able to best exhibit clean and complete logic without the complications that real life accounts can present. If an example is fabricated, than the only angles in which it an be analyzed are those presented by the creator of the story.

Examples from history are also very effective in the arena of politics. As the book says, to bring up 'Richard Nixon' as an example will automatically create the image of political figures and betrayal. So comparing a current figure to Nixon will force the reader to consider the traitorous similarities between the two figures, as a result of Nixon's legacy.

Another form of logos is the analogy, or comparing one action or event to another (usually hypothetical) one. If somebody does not understand why 'x' means 'y', than the rhetor can refer to a similar case were 'x' more clearly implies 'y'. Analogies are often times fabricated because, once again, by fabricating an example you can propose the most clean and clear logical thought pattern. Sometimes analogies and examples can be polar opposites. In this case the rhetor can make the argument that if something is true on one end of the spectrum, then the opposite must be true on the other end.

Maxims are also effective because they are 'wise sayings' as accepted by the general public. And who are we to go against 'wise sayings'? This is a way to put the opinion of a respected figure with the backing of an entire public against or in line with a certain argument. For example, our teacher might give us advice that goes in one ear and right out the other, but when that same advice can be tied to a Confucian Proverb it suddenly holds a ton more weight.

review

I thought this assignment was a nice hybrid of personal and academic writing. Good writing is only produced when the writer is passionate about the subject. Sometimes it is hard to satisfy writing assignments that I just don’t care about because if there is no personal investment then there is less urgency, which leads to watered down writing. Although one problem I faced with this particular paper was a surprising vagueness of the event. Once I started writing the paper I realized I had forgotten a lot more about the event than I thought I ever would have. This forced me to dig deeper for explicit details and the temptation to fabricate certain details grew stronger and stronger. However, when comparing the event to online research it put lots of things into context for me such has the seeming regularity of occurrences like this. I never quite considered the repercussions of isolation and loneliness until I saw the minority statistics for suicide.

I thought I got my points across fairly clearly, but to some degree I was still digging for something to write about rather than letting out something that was building up inside me. I have recognized that all my best writing has been when I feel as though I need to get some thoughts out on paper. Those instances are the equivalent to a player getting an adrenaline rush during a football game, an overwhelming feeling that supercharges my writing. The challenge is getting into that zone more often, I need to find a way to wire up an on/off switch to that feeling. But this paper was still an enjoyable one to write, and a good transition for me to move on from just writing personal stories to writing something the public may be interested in also.

Mandatory Blog 2

Chapter 2 was about seizing the moment, rhetorically of course. They started by addressing what the ancient greeks used to call Kairos. Kairos meant the comprehension of non-linear time, or time measured by opportunites rather than minute by minute. Although this is an ancient word and an ancient concept it can be appropriately applied to writing in today's world. An example of being "kairotic" would be writing about topic that has just turned hot, writing about an issue that is currently sweeping the community would be seizing a rhetorical moment. For example, magazine writers must do it all the time, articles discussing spousal abuse popped up everyhwere after the Rhianna incident and the "history of steriods" articles have been all over hte pages of sports magazines and websites over the past few years. The overall history of an issue would have been referred to as "chronos", but the "kairos" of that issue would be the main turning points involved in it. What were all the periods during the lifetime of that issue that truly define what it is today? That would be it's kairos. Kairos can be a means of invention because it can evolve or tweak an issure. Writers will oftentimes wait on the right moment to tackle an issue, but the window of time you choose to tackle that issue helps to define the way in which you do it. Kairos allows you to freeze these 'windows' in time an analyze the issue form all sides, keeping it in context with the time and all the parties involved. As the book explains, a perfect example of kairos writing were the gun control essays that came out after the virginia tech shootings, it is as simple as using the developments around us as fuel for our writing engine. Use current issues and events to propell our writings out into the spotlight. The opportunistic writer is often tiems the successful one, learining how to attack windows of opportunity with relevant writing is one of the surest ways to gain to attention of your readers.

Another Reeming.

::Sigh::

Ok, where to start.

Devaluing Mendenhall because he's 'injury prone' ...you have Westbrook and Palmer, nuff said. Omg but he has a bruised knee?!...he's a Running Back in the NFL, he practiced fully, he's fine. But he only avg'd 14.5 per week! ('only' being the operative word there). Thats more than your RB's are avging per week combined, i'll take that all day Mr. Burner.

Breaston, is he a true #3? he has more yards and fantasy points than Boldin, who is constantly banged up and has yet to practice this week because of a high ankle sprain. I like Breaston better than Boldin right now in a high octane passing offense.

--INTERMISSION-- Excuse me while i sift through all the failed attempts at humor in your enormous post, i need to find more stats to poke holes in.

OK, back folks...ah yes...7 catches in 6 games, 1.16875463 RPG yada yada...but wait! i thought we agreed that in those first 3 games he barely saw the field? you trickster you, that 1.16 RPG is SKEWED!!!!..lets keep our stats in context ok?

I put some heavy research (certainly not as heavy as yours) into this groundbreaking trend you refer to as "buying low, and selling high"...after being thoroughly confused for hours i think i finally got the hang of it. But, well, frankly i don't think Slaton for Forte fits that mold, i think you just traded a good RB for a shittier one.

Now, on a more serious note. By having a less than stellar draft (throwing away 5th and 6th round picks on Cutler and LJ) i put myself in a tough spot, and made a tough decision to let Randy go for an RB who i believe has a chance of finishing in the top 10 and making my team a little more stable. So Mr. Commissioner, know that i understand your bitterness stems from being ranked 7th overall and 3rd in your division with a 3-3 record, after trying desperately to fix your situation with a whopping 31 personnel moves. And hey, combine that with a dismal track record in your own league over the past few years (according to reliable sources)... and the constant updating of your Smack Talk as if it were a Twitter account starts to make a little more sense. So seeing how i have already proven that I am the better fantasy manager (SEE AP Football 2009; Week 1), I am going to hang the gloves up for now.

And as far as my dear friend Anthony DelCioppo's facial expressions are concerned, I'm just glad I had the opportunity to put a smile there, thats what friends are for right?


P.S. I was very impressed by the statistics and specific quotations in your first rebuttle, but seeing as it was not in MLA format nor was there a Works Cited page included, I'm forced to deem those quotes and stats as unsubstantiated.

a reeming

Just vote the trade down and move on with your lives gentlemen.

Randy, the guy has been a dud for me before last week (a dud in relation to the 13th overall pick i spent on him) Until he played the worst secondary in football, at home, in the snow (huge advantage for the Patriots) he hadn't put up Randy-numbers. Yea he will be a top 10 receiver, but I don't think him an Brady are reverting back to their 2007 status. And i've decided to take my chances with Anthony Gonzalez returning this season and being a solid #2 for me, with Ginn and Breaston rotating at #3. Its a big risk to put that much confidence in Gonzalez being able to return with no setbacks, but im a risky sort of guy

Mendenhall is a top 15 fantasy back already despite having only 7 carries through the first 3 weeks. In a league that is over-run with teams who use run by committee's i now have 2 solid backs who are going to guarantee me carries each and every week, oh yea and Mendenhall can catch the ball and pound it on the goal line too.

Dear Mr. Commish, or 'Burner', if i may call you that - , for some reason you seem to be absolutely TEEMING with bitterness and jealousy towards my fantasy decision making skills and subsequent leading position in the division. I'm going to attempt to put into context exactly how terrible your fantasy team really is, here are some fun facts for the entire league to enjoy:

--Steve Breaston has more receiving yards than both your #2 and #3 receivers, but even MORE interesting, is how he has received for more yards than either Forte OR Westbrook have rushed for...weren't those your top 2 picks? ouch...

--Kevin Smith may play for the Lions, but he is one of the only remaining backs who shares almost NO carries and he has outscored every single player on your team besides carson palmer.

--team redemption # of top 15 RB's (as per fantasy points) = 2

--matt's vicktorious # of top 15 RB's (as per fantasy points) = 0

Jim i still love you and respect your opinions, although i think your wrong on this one.

Seacrest out.

my brand

After sending out 12 forms requesting a personal assessment to be done by selected friends and family members, a Personal Branding picture of Kyle Murphy (the subject) was painted. Aside from a few road bumps regarding the punctuality of respondents, the assessments were not only more accurate and concise than the subject had expected, but also more agreeable to his own assessments of himself. Traits selected by the participants and subject alike seemed to pile into groups highlighting cooperative nature, outgoing/humorous personality and creative/imaginative mindset. Opinions on the subject’s greatest strengths mirrored most of these traits, while nearly all participants agreed that procrastination and lack of focus were the subject’s Achilles’ heel. Car and cereal comparisons seemed to convey ideas of solid, reliable foundation with a subtle flashiness. The culmination of these opinions reflected predictably in the ‘Team Role’ suggestions, and agreeably with the VALS survey results. Creator and Doer comprised 70% of the participants suggestions (73% if the subject’s opinion is included) for team role while the VALS survey categorized the subject as an ‘Innovator/Experiencer’.

Going back to respondents, most were prompt, and some were surprisingly prompt (Wesley and Anthony) while others needed constant verbal or personal reminders that the survey needed completion (Claire, Dave, Meagan and Michael). The most reliable person on the list (Meagan) was impossible to get a hold of and never even returned any results. So apart from a few surprises most of the response results were positive and as expected. However it required far too much time and effort to ‘reel in’ Dave and Michael so they would not be contacted for any future survey assistance.

The subject chose 6% (8 of 127) of the available traits to describe himself the best he could. It was shocking to find that those 8 traits, or 6% of the available whole, comprised 36% (31 of 85) of the traits that the respondents used to peg his personality. Also, this data does not take into account the other traits chosen by respondents that are synonymous with the 8 that the subject picked himself. This proves that the subject was fairly in tune with his strengths and flaws relative to how others perceive him. As the attached ‘Personal Percentages’ graph shows, all the selected traits can be grouped together in 7 separate and broader categories. When grouped properly the 85 traits taken from the respondents speak to the subject’s Cooperative Nature, Personality Plus’, Ethics, Creative Capacity, Passive & Aggressive Indicators and Overall Poor Personality Traits. Refer to the attached graph for percentage breakdown.

The Car and Cereal prompts give a more intangible opinion on the ‘make’ of the subject. It was here that results were most closely related, 40% of cereal choices were Lucky Charms and 40% of car choices were Luxury vehicles. Even more striking is the fact that the Lucky Charms were selected for the exact same reason Luxury vehicles were, they both represent a good foundation and just enough flash and style not to overdo it (according to the respondents). The strengths and weaknesses outlined by the respondents are a perfect blend of the structured trait selection and open-ended car/cereal comparison, and are quoted in the attached “Source A” and “Source B”.

High school part 2

I had missed my first period class, it was sometime in the spring of my junior year and I had just walked through the double doors that connect the student parking lot to the back hallways of the school. There was nobody in sight, first period was about to end and at this hour both the students and teachers were still zombified. Then came that familiar pounding, I was standing at the juncture of two hallways which met as an “ L”. The one man stampede was approaching from my right, and once he got close enough for me to hear his chains I looked up and saw Danny blasting down the hallway, full steam ahead. Now had this been anybody else in the world I would have thought something was wrong, or at least been startled. But instead I just watched Danny pass me by like a pedestrian watches traffic as he waits to cross a highway. But Danny attempted to turn the corner at much too high a speed and lost his footing. He slammed down onto his side and skid across the hallways into the lockers, rattling the entire row of them. I started to laugh uncontrollably, trying my best to stifle it with no avail. But instead of ignoring this rudeness like he was so accustomed to doing, he sprang up with tears in his eyes and screamd “FUCK YOU!” as he kept running down the hall.

I didn’t find out what had happened to Danny’s friend until after school, from my mother. Apparently the boy (who was a member of the ‘goth party’) was severely depressed and had jumped off the roof of the Holiday Inn hotel near our school, killing himself. He was 17 years old and coincidently he was one of the few black students that attended my school. This was the first time a student from my high school had died while I was attending it so I had no idea what to expect the following morning, but what actually happened had NEVER crossed my mind. Nothing.

The following day of school was perfectly normal, not many people even knew who the boy was so most of the school didn’t even know it had happened. The school did absolutely nothing to acknowledge the tragedy, no assembly, no moment of silence, not even an announcement that it had happened at all. Throughout the day I saw about 4 or 5 people, none of whom I knew, crying. There were just enough tears being shed that some people started inquiring whether or not something was up? I told a few of my friends what I had heard but no one, including myself, knew who the kid was or even what his name was.

After my lunch period I was walking down the hallway to my Spanish class when I saw about 4 or 5 of the ‘goths’ crowded around a locker, the only reason I was ever even able to put a face on the boy was because of one of those pictures. As I passed by I caught a glimpse of one picture, a close up of the boy and his girlfriend kissing. They were both covered in makeup and seemed to have powdered their faces to appear more pale, I never understood the habits of that particular group of kids. A few candles were lit under the locker and they group of kids were chuckling madly, probably exchanging funny stories about the boy as is so common after death. It made me feel a little better to see them laughing because I knew how enraged they really were over the fact that my school would not recognize the situation. All of the sudden a teacher swooped down around the corner like a hawk and came to a skidding halt in front of the locker. “Sorry folks gotta pack up and move out.” he said, with the lamest attempt to try and make light of the situation. “What do you mean the bell isn’t going to ring for another 20 minutes. Why do we have to leave now.” asked one of the girls. “What class are you supposed to be in?” he snapped. “Study Hall, but Mrs. Pirotta said it was ok if we came and decorated his locker.” The teacher seemed at a loss for words for just a moment, then he blurted “nonsense, the candles are a fire hazard and you’re only allowed to decorate lockers on holidays.” He turned on his heels and was back around the corner before any of the kids could open their mouths. I could not even fathom how he could have been so insensitive about the subject. Why was the administration acting like this? I had no idea. As two of the girls started crying, the group blew out the candles and left, but did not take the pictures down and I though, good for them. Of course it is entirely possible that the teacher had not heard of the incident yet, however unlikely that may be, yet either way he never even game them an opportunity to explain themselves. It seemed as though the school was treating the incident like a conspiracy.

high school

Connetquot high school sits in the center of Bohemia, NY tucked away in one of the remaining non-residential corners of the town. Thick green forest surrounds the school grounds on three sides, when on campus you can’t see anything over the trees except for a Holiday Inn that is about a mile north of Connetquot HS. The school is isolated from the rest of the town just as the town seems to be isolated from the rest of the world. Bohemia is a very middle sized town, with a middle sized High School filled with the children of middle class adults. I could count on two hands the number of students in my graduating class that were not white Catholics, and that’s out of 573 graduates (no, it was not a catholic HS). All the cliché groups of people were represented at Connetquot High School, the jocks, the nerds, the Goths, the drama club, the drug users, the fighters and then everybody else. I was in the latter category. I had friends from each of those clicks except the goths and the drama club, not because I held anything against them that’s just the way it worked out. Although I had a few classes with one kid named Danny who was a member of the goth group.
Danny is a character I’ll never forget. He must have weighed 270 pounds and stood about 6’ 2”, his burnt orange hair matched the hundreds of freckles on his face leaving no doubt as to his Irish ancestry, but his affinity for anime and his preferred hair style (samurai bun) told a different tale. As if that wasn’t confusing enough then his attire certainly sealed the deal. The black cut off motorcycle gloves matched the cut off black jean shorts, which matched black combat boots. The combat boots always looks bigger than they actually were, but that was just an illusion caused by the matching black tube socks which reached up to his knees. The plain black cut off tshirt anchored the ensamble while chains connected nearly all his articles of clothing as if they would fall apart if not appropriately attached to one another. A strange kid, but one I developed an odd sort of relationship with granted our constant proximity to one another.
Another strange characteristic of his was his need to sprint, and I do mean SPRINT, from each class to the next. Every day I would be at my locker talking to my neighbors when we would hear the slow pounding coming from the far end of the hallway, it would grow louder and louder until he got close enough for us to here the treble of his chains compliment the sonic boom that came with each stomp of his enormous boots. Needless to say Danny was constantly tripped and ridiculed, he was infamous. Everybody knew about the ‘goth’ group but nobody seemed to know who any of the members were besides Danny. Somehow the others just existed in the background, too obscure to even attract ridicule from the most ruthless bullies. Danny is still alive today, but I bring him up because he was the only link I had to the kid who committed suicide, Danny was close to him and was the only person I saw who grieved the loss and spoke up about the way the school treated the incident.adf

The Necessary Rebuttle

::Sigh::

Ok, where to start.

Devaluing Mendenhall because he's 'injury prone' ...you have Westbrook and Palmer, nuff said. Omg but he has a bruised knee?!...he's a Running Back in the NFL, he practiced fully, he's fine. But he only avg'd 14.5 per week! ('only' being the operative word there). Thats more than your RB's are avging per week combined, i'll take that all day Mr. Burner.

Breaston, is he a true #3? he has more yards and fantasy points than Boldin, who is constantly banged up and has yet to practice this week because of a high ankle sprain. I like Breaston better than Boldin right now in a high octane passing offense.

--INTERMISSION-- Excuse me while i sift through all the failed attempts at humor in your enormous post, i need to find more stats to poke holes in.

OK, back folks...ah yes...7 catches in 6 games, 1.16875463 RPG yada yada...but wait! i thought we agreed that in those first 3 games he barely saw the field? you trickster you, that 1.16 RPG is SKEWED!!!!..lets keep our stats in context ok?

I put some heavy research (certainly not as heavy as yours) into this groundbreaking trend you refer to as "buying low, and selling high"...after being thoroughly confused for hours i think i finally got the hang of it. But, well, frankly i don't think Slaton for Forte fits that mold, i think you just traded a good RB for a shittier one.

Now, on a more serious note. By having a less than stellar draft (throwing away 5th and 6th round picks on Cutler and LJ) i put myself in a tough spot, and made a tough decision to let Randy go for an RB who i believe has a chance of finishing in the top 10 and making my team a little more stable. So Mr. Commissioner, know that i understand your bitterness stems from being ranked 7th overall and 3rd in your division with a 3-3 record, after trying desperately to fix your situation with a whopping 31 personnel moves. And hey, combine that with a dismal track record in your own league over the past few years (according to reliable sources)... and the constant updating of your Smack Talk as if it were a Twitter account starts to make a little more sense. So seeing how i have already proven that I am the better fantasy manager (SEE AP Football 2009; Week 1), I am going to hang the gloves up for now.

And as far as my dear friend Anthony DelCioppo's facial expressions are concerned, I'm just glad I had the opportunity to put a smile there, thats what friends are for right?


P.S. I was very impressed by the statistics and specific quotations in your first rebuttle, but seeing as it was not in MLA format nor was there a Works Cited page included, I'm forced to deem those quotes and stats as unsubstantiated.

IT

Overhead shot of a newspaper on a coffee table inside a quaint middle-lower class house in Derry, Maine. Camera slowly zooms in on the paper while rotating slightly, it is a local newspaper and the front page is advertising the annual town fair. Very subtle eerie music is playing softly in the background, when the camera zooms enough so that the coffee table is taking up the whole shot, the eerie music suddenly stops and a giggling boy’s hand snatches the paper off of the table.

It’s a gray day outside and it is raining moderately, the mood is very pleasant and comfortable like a nice lazy rainy day.

The camera follows the giddy 6 year old (paper in hand) into his older brothers room (around 10 yrs old) who is bed-ridden with a nasty cough.

Bill Densbrough (Stuttering Bill)- 10year old brother, very smart, bad stuttering problem.
George Densbrough (Georgie)- 6year old brother.

Bill is showing George how to make a newspaper boat because George wants to go play with it out in the rain. The mood is very light and there needs to be a few scenes showing how close the brothers are, they exchange some laughs over some childhood jokes. The boys make the boat, and Bill tells George to go to the basement to get the tub of wax (they need it melt wax over the boat so it stays waterproof).

Camera follows George through the hallway to the basement door which is located in the kitchen.

When G arrives at the door it gets eerily silent, he is apprehensive about going down to the dark basement as all kids are. He reaches for the knob and slowly pushes the door open…

At this point the camera is directly behind george, and it is peering over his head, you would see George from behind, his shoulders and head occupying the bottom center of the shot, most of the shot is fixated on the slowly opening door. The door slowly swings open and it is complete blackness, you cant even see the stairs leading down to the basement. Still in the kitchen, it is totally silent except for the raindrops hitting a nearby window, the camera never moves.

George slowly leans into the darkness and stretches out his left arm to search for the light switch which is placed on the wall. He keeps reaching in further and further, taking a step or two down the stairs in his search for the switch.

Maybe some suspenseful building strings in the background.
The camera goes on a very slow zoom into the basement doorway where George is reaching.

At suspense climax George’s mother says off-screen “George?! What are you doing going down there?” Some dialogue here about the boat, then the mom turns on the light for George so he can go downstairs to get the wax.

On cue with the mothers voice, the camera position switches. It is now turned 90 degrees to the right, this way both the mother and George are in the shot, audience breaths a sigh of relief. The camera shows George getting the wax and bringing it back to his older brothers room.

Gore's Movie

Global Warming has been one of the most talked about issues of the past few years. There are people on the far left who scream “Armageddon”, saying humanity is single handedly facilitating the destruction of Planet Earth as we know it, and there are people on the far right who say its nothing more than a fairy tale and nothing we do affects our planet whatsoever. Then there are people who I like to refer to as “rationalists”, who try to take every fact and idea into account (even ideas from the extreme ends of the spectrum), analyze it and make logically and educated decisions. I don’t think I need to say which is the most desirable group of the three. I know that An Inconvenient Truth presents a lot of material that cannot be argued, and I agree that global warming is a problem, and I want to say first that I do agree with the overall message of this movie. I agree that to some degree we are helping to facilitate global warming, what I am skeptical about is how large of a role we actually play, and on top of that I think we are dealing with the problem in the wrong way.
I will be the first to admit that I am a skeptical and cynical person by nature. So when I see movies like this, especially ones made by politicians, I am VERY skeptical about its true intent. The facts are all there, and you cant argue with facts, however you need to keep in mind that Al Gore has a purpose, a goal in mind. He wants to scare people into action, he wants the shock value, and rightfully so. He is an intelligent man, he knows that unless someone lights a fire under our asses nobody is going to take action. So to me it was funny how all the different graphs he used had different timelines, some went back only 50 years, others went back 650,000 years. I’m not saying he was hiding something, but I can tell that some of his graphs and facts were tailored to have the hardest and most surprising impact on the viewers. For instance, he has a graph showing the fluctuation of CO2 and Temperature dating back 650,000 years. Along this graph you can see that temperature and CO2 levels rise and fall almost identically. At the end of this graph is a projection of the CO2 levels in 50 years, it is almost double of what it is today. Now, knowing that the temperature is going to follow the CO2 levels, this means he is insinuating that the average temperature of the earth will nearly double…in 50 years. Maybe this fact is true, but I just find it hard to believe that we are capable of doubling the average planet temperature in only 50 years, that means that in 2055 the average temperature of the earth will be 116 degrees. The graph proves a valid point, but something about just did not seem right.
Now all my skepticism aside, it certainly is an extremely important movie. His tactics on simplifying everything so everyone can understand it is phenomenal. And the way he uses his own life to really drive points home on a personal level is equally as admirable. Global warming is a huge problem and we are making it much worse. I do not deny the fact that our current practices are hurting our planet and that change is MUCH needed. There are loads of undeniable evidence in this movie that shows us we are in big trouble, Mt. Kilimanjaro’s snowcaps are receding and almost gone, and glaciers around the world are receding rapidly. This glacier problem is especially serious because so many people worldwide rely on glacier run-off as there drinking water. Another dangerous effect of global warming is the warming of the oceans. It is the ocean and wind currents which circulate heat around the globe, and for the ocean to do its part it relies on a balance between hot and cold currents. If the ocean is heated up too much these currents will shift in unpredictable ways. On top of that, warmer oceans give way to stronger storms, warm water is what feeds hurricanes, and not only have hurricanes become stronger, but they also are showing up in places around the globe where we thought it wasn’t possible (Coast of Brazil). According to the film we have set a tornado record in 2005, and Japan set a typhoon record in the same year. These are only a few of the side effects of global warming, so any argument against it’s presence at this point is pretty much moot. However, in the introduction I stated that I thought we were dealing with the problem the wrong way, and what I mean by that is I think its high time we start funneling funds and attention in to ways of COPING with this problem rather then preventing it.